INTRODUCTION
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease
affecting the vascular system produces several vascular manifestations, such
as, vasculitis, vasculopathy, and premature atherosclerosis1.
Also
Patients with SLE often have cognitive complaints that are not specific to one
brain region or cognitive domain, and in the majority of patients’ cognitive
dysfunction are subclinical2 which may manifest with impaired social function and work
disability3,4.
Neuropsychiatric
systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a diagnostically challenging, severe,
and life-threatening condition, which is currently lacking a"gold
standard."5.
It has been reported that SLE patients may suffer from
regional or general abnormal cortical blood flow6 even in the
absence of neurological symptoms7. The quantitative
measurement of CBFV is
possible by different noninvasive methods such as
sTable xenon-enhanced CT, single-photon emission CT, positron-emission tomography, and MR imaging technology. These
have proved to achieve reliable and accurate measurements of CBFV. All of these
techniques, however, are bulky and expensive. Previous in vitro and in vivo
studies have demonstrated a close correlation between phase contrast MR imaging
and Doppler require ultrasound (US)8.
Doppler sonography is suggested to be a potentially practical method for the
measurement of CBFV in the internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) as an estimate
for cerebral blood flow9. However imaging with sonography has showed
an overestimation of BFV, but being applied up till now as it is practically
applicable and widely available in comparison with other procedures10.
This study aimed to measure the TCBFV in patients with SLE using Doppler
ultrasonography and to determine whether a relationship exists between cerebral
perfusion changes with disease activity and cognitive screening tests.
SUBJECTS
AND METHODS
After
approval of the study by the Ethics Committee of the Kasr Al-Aini
Hospital, Cairo university and
after obtaining informed consent, this comparative cross-sectional study was
performed.
Subjects
Twenty-one
SLE female patients with mean age of 28.24±8.92 years & duration of illness
of 4.48±3.92 years were included in this study and all fulfilled the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
for SLE11. Nine of them
manifested with neuropsychiatric Lupus during the course of the disease.
Ten
Healthy volunteer subjects matched by age, sex and educational level were
taken. The patients were recruited from the Rheumatology and Internal medicine
departments, Kasr El Aini University Hospital.
Secondary
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed in ten SLE patients according to
the Miyakis et al.criteria12. Disease activity was quantified using
the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)13.
Methods
All
subjects underwent the following
1. Cognitive screening: using
The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) its maximum score was100 points14.
2. Extracranial Doppler
ultrasonography: were performed at Kasr El Aini neurology department
neurovascular ultrasonographic laboratory, by a 7MHZ probe Phillips HDI 5000
ultrasound equipment. CBF volume was determined as the sum of the flow volumes
of ICA and the
VA of both sides (Figure 1 a and b).
It
was calculated as following
Total
CBFV (both ICA
+ Both VA) ml/min= RT CBFV + LT CBFV
Data management and analysis:
Statistical
package for social science (SPSS) version 12 was used for data management and
analysis. Descriptive analyses were conducted using frequencies and percentage
for qualitative variables, and mean and standard deviation for quantitative
variables. To test the significance of difference between quantitative
variables not normally distributed, Mann Whitney test was used. Chi square test
was used to compare qualitative variables. Spearman correlation was performed
to study the relation between numerical variable.
RESULTS
Detailed
description of patients’ demographics and clinical data is shown in Table (1).
Six of
our SLE patients (28%) have abnormal MRI brain as described in Table (2).
Cerebral Blood Flow
Volume
a) Patients versus
control (Table 3):
Although
Total Cerebral Blood Flow Volume (TCBFV) was lower in patient group than in
control group but this is not reaching statistically significant difference.
Yet; CBFV is significantly lower in Left ICA in the patients compared to
Controls group.
b) Comparison between patients subgroups:
Comparison
between TCBFV for patients with NSLE and those without NSLE showed no
statistically significant difference (p=0.2). Comparing the TCBFV between SLE patients
with APS and those without APS syndrome revealed no statistical significant
difference (p=0.14)
Cognitive screening
(3Ms) test
It is value ranged from
78 to 100 with mean 86.68±11.39 in SLE patients compared to control group which
ranged from 86 to 99 with mean 93.7±1.09. However on comparison of the test
sub-items, a statistical significant difference was found between the two
groups in many sub-items of the 3MS; as the mental reversal (p=0.03) and
Repetition (p= 0.04) Table (4) & also the mean value of the 3MS was lower
in the patients subgroup with APS (91±6.5) than in the patients without APS
(82.8±13.6) but without statistically significant difference. However on
comparison of the test sub-items a statistically significant difference was
found between the two subgroups in three sub-items of the 3MS; the four-legged
animals (p=0.01), repetition (p=0.05), and writing ( p=0.03).
Total Cerebral
Blood Flow Volume (CBFV) Correlations
In our
patient populations we did not detect significant correlation of The TCBFV with
age, duration of illness, BMI or Blood pressure. Inspite of positive correlation of TCBFV with
3 Ms total score, this correlation did not reach significant value (r=0.33
& p=0.08) There was a statistical significant negative correlation between
TCBFV and disease activity score assessed by the SLEDAI. (r=-0.52 & P value=0.01) (Table 5 & Figure 1).
DISCUSSION
This
study aimed to measure TCBFV and whether a relationship exists between cerebral
perfusion changes with disease activity and cognitive screening tests.
In our
study, we found that cerebral perfusion in SLE patient was lower compared to
the healthy control group but this was not statically significance. Which can
be explained by Zardi et al.15, who demonstrated that vascular
changes in SLE patients are time dependent, and are significantly associated
with the duration of the disease, which is about 4.48±3.92 years in our
population and also our study is a cross sectional study which did not detect
changes of the patients’cerebral blood flow over time. It is reasonable to
favor longitudinal study to detect the changes of the cerebral blood flow
during the patient’s disease course over time. Another factor contributing to
our result is that we included Patients (42.8%) who manifested with NPSLE
during the disease course and not at time of the study ,and hence, they were
not suffering from recent cerebrovascular disease or lupus cerebritis. However,
Left Internal Carotid Artery blood flow volume was significantly lower in SLE
patients compared to controls and this agree with Kubinyi et al.16, who
observed that The perfusion defects in his SLE patients were predominantly localized
in frontal and temporal lobes of the left
hemisphere.
The
cerebral perfusion was significantly lower in patients with ongoing disease
activity as assessed by SLEDAI, which would suggest that the alteration in
blood flow is related to SLE activity; this is in accordance with Falcini et al.17.
An association between changes in the SPECT and SLE activity was also found18.
These findings might suggest that the changes in cerebral perfusion may be
related to diffuse cerebral as well as inflammatory vasculopathy resulting from
the clinical and inflammatory activity of the SLE.
TCBFV
did not show significant difference in patients either with NPSLE or with non
-NPSLE, the results can be explained by heterogeneity of causes in the
pathogenesis of NPSLE and the different vascular adaptation of cerebral
macrocirculation as opposed to cerebral microcirculation may represent possible
reasons for the inability of ultrasound to differentiate SLE patients from
NPSLE patients.16
Antiphospholipid
antibodies (aPL) Directed predominantly against phospholipid-binding proteins
such as glycoprotein I and prothrombin, aPL induce a procoagulant state and are
associated with focal manifestations of NPSLE, such as stroke and seizures
which possibly due to thrombosis within
vessels of minute caliber so we dd not found
significant changes in TCBFV
between SLE patients with APS and those without19.
In this
study, a difference between patients and controls regarding cognitive
assessment by measuring total score of 3MS was found but did not reach
statistical significance. However, the absence of a significant difference by
total score contradicts other studies, pointed out before, and reporting a
prevalence of cognitive impairment ranging from to 20% to 80%. This could be
attributed to the fact that screening tests identify cognitively impaired
patients but still have substantial rates of false-negative findings20.
In this study, analysis of the sub-items of the 3MS showed significant
difference; with patients scoring less than controls as regards Attention,
tested by mental reversal, and Language, as tested by Repetition of a phrase.
The finding of specific defects affecting Attention and Language is in
accordance with other studies confirming a defect in these domains21,22.
The divergent networks of attention explain its wide affection in most of
diffuse vascular pathological conditions and most of subcortical cognitive
affection23.
In 3MS
the repetition task involves sentence repetition; in our cases sentence
repetition was impaired while short term memory (word recall) was intact; which
suggests syntactic and semantic processing defect. Yet further more detailed
assessment of short term memory and of non-word repetition tasks were required
to verify our findings and help in recognizing pathophysiological basis of
repetition affection in our patients24. This can be explained by the
pattern of cognitive impairment is the same as between our patient subgroups as
regard presence of APS or not which agree with Chapman et al.25, who
found that decline in cognitive function, possibly due
to thrombosis within vessels of minute caliber which confirmed by our study in
which 19% has abnormal MRI brain compared by 4.7% in patients without APS and
also there were an evidence of in vitro modulation of neural function raise the
alternative possibility of a direct pathogenic effect on neurons.
We could not detect significant association between the
Cognitive screening dysfunction (subcortical pattern) and the TCBFV measured by
Doppler ultrasonography and this agree with Waterloo et al.26, who
proof that no significant association between rCBF by SPECT or
neuropsychological measures. Cognitive dysfunction may be related to an
inflammatory process in the white matter that leads to cognitive impairment by
a process of early myelin injury followed by neuronal loss without significant
disturbance in cerebral perfusion and
also explained by Omdal et al.27, who reported an association
between anti-glutamate receptor antibodies and cognitive dysfunction which not
related to a significant disturbance in cerebral perfusion in SLE patients.
In
conclusion, this study suggests that using ultrasound for measuring TCBFV
cannot detect evident cerebral hypoperfusion. However, lower TCBFV in SLE
patients is associated with more disease activity, and can be beneficial as an
early marker of activity in longitudinal follow up, but not related to the subcortical cognitive
dysfunction.
[Disclosure: Authors report no conflict of interest]
REFERENCES
1.
Kao AH, Sabantine JM, Manzi S. Update on
vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr opin Rheumatol. 2003; 15:
519-27.
2.
Denburg SD, Denburg JA. Cognitive
dysfunction and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Lupus. 2003; 12: 883-90.
3.
Appenzeller S, Cendes F, Costallat LT.
Cognitive impairment and employment status in systemic lupus erythematosus: a
prospective longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61: 680-7.
4.
Olazarán J, López-Longo J, Cruz I, Bittini
A, Carreño L. Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence
and correlates. Eur Neurol. 2009; 62: 49-55.
5.
Wang PI,
Cagnoli PC,
McCune WJ,
Schmidt-Wilcke T,
Lowe SE,
Graft CC,
et al. Perfusion-weighted MR imaging in
cerebral lupus erythematosus. Acad Radiol.
2012 Aug; 19(8): 965-70.
6.
Shen YY, Kao CH, Ho YJ, Lee JK. Regional
cerebral blood flow in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J
Neuroimaging. 1999; 9: 160-4.
7.
Huang WS, Chiu PY, Tsai CH, Kao A, Lee CC.
Objective evidence of abnormal regional cerebral blood flow in patients with
systemic lupus erythematosus on Tc-99m ECD brain SPECT.
Rheumatol Int. 2002; 22: 178-81.
8.
Hoppe M, Heverhagen JT, Froelich JJ,
Kunisch-Hoppe M, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ. Correlation of flow velocity measurements
by magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging and intravascular Doppler
ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 1998; 8: 427-32.
9.
Soustiel JF, Glenn TC, Vespa P, Rinsky B,
Hanuscin C, Martin NA. Assessment of cerebral blood flow by means of
blood-flow-volume measurement in the internal carotid artery: comparative study
with a 133 xenon clearance technique. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1876-80.
10. Eicke
BM, Tegeler CH. Ultrasonic quantification of blood flow volume. In: Tegeler CH,
Babikian VL, Gomez CR, eds. Neurosonology. New York: Mosby-Year Book; 1996, pp. 101-10.
11. Hochberg
MC. Updating the American
College of Rheumatology
revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep; 40(9): 1725.
12. Miyakis
S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International
consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite
antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Feb; 4(2): 295-306.
13. Bombardier
C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A
disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies
in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jun; 35(6): 630-40.
14. Teng
EL, Chui HC. The Modified
Mini-Mental State
(3MS) examination. J ClinPsychiatry. 1987 Aug; 48(8): 314-8.
15. Zardi EM,
Vernieri F,
Navarini L,
Taccone A,
Sambataro G,
Alemanno P,
et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus patients with and without neuropsychiatric
manifestations: a neck and transcranial duplex sonography study. Int J
ImmunopatholPharmacol. 2012; 25(4): 1157-6.
16. Kubinyi
J, Peterová V, Olejárová M, Dostá
Cl, Rysová L, Kupka K. The role of anatomic and functional
imaging in the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric involvementin systemic lupus
erythematosus (NPSLE). Charles
University Prague, the First Faculty
of Medicine, Czech Republic. Poster presented at
the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Annual Congress; Barcelona; 2009 OCT 10-14.
17. Falcini
F, De Cristofaro MT, Ermini M, Guarnieri M, Massai G,
Olmastroni M, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow in juvenile systemic lupus
erythematosus: a prospective SPECT study. Single photon emission computed
tomography. J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar; 25(3): 583-8.
18.
Sanna G, Piga M,
Terryberry JW, Peltz MT, Giagheddu S, Satta L, et al. Central nervous systemic
involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: cerebral imaging and serological
profile in patients with and without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations.
Lupus. 2000; 9(8): 573-83.
19. Menon
S, Jameson-Shortall E, Newman SP, Hall-Craggs MR,Chinn R, Isenberg DA. A
longitudinal study of anticardiolipin antibody levels and cognitive functioning
in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42: 735-41.
20. Leritz
E, Brandt J, Minor M, Reis-Jensen F, Petri M. "Subcortical" cognitive
impairment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Int Neuropsychol
Soc. 2000 Nov; 6(7): 821-5.
21. Brey
RL, Holliday SL, Saklad AR, Navarrete MG, Hermosillo-Romo D, Stallworth CL, et
al. Neuropsychiatric syndromes in lupus: prevalence using
standardizeddefinitions. Neurology. 2002 Apr 23; 58(8): 1214-20.
22. Kozora
E, West SG, Kotzin BL, Julian L, Porter S, Bigler E. Magnetic resonance imaging
abnormalities and cognitive deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus patients
without overt central nervous system disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jan; 41(1):
41-7.
23. Barker-Collo
SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Parag V, Senior H, Rodgers A. Reducing attention
deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomized controlled
trial. Stroke. 2009 Oct; 40(10): 3293-8.
24. Butterworth
B, warrington
E. Two Routes to Repetition: Evidence from a Case of 'Deep Dysphasia'.
Neurocase. 1995;1: 55- 66.
25.
Chapman J, Cohen-Armon
M, Shoenfeld Y, Korczyn AD. Antiphospholipid antibodies permeabilize and
depolarize brain synaptoneurosomes. Lupus. 1999; 8: 127-33.
26. Waterloo K,
Omdal R,
Sjöholm H,
Koldingsnes W,
Jacobsen EA,
Sundsfjord JA,
et al, Neuropsychological dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus is not
associated with changes in cerebral blood flow. J Neurol.
2001 Jul; 248(7): 595-602.
27.
Omdal R, Brokstad K,
Waterloo K, et al. Neuropsychiatric disturbances in SLE are associated with
antibodies against NMDA receptors. European Journal of Neurology. 2005; 12: 392-8.