INTRODUCTION
Systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease that is caused by autoantibodies
to a variety of autoantigens. It is characterized by a wide variety of
clinical, serological manifestations and relapsing remitting course1.
Neuropsychiatric manifestations are commonly found in patients with SLE and are
an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients2. In
1999, the American
College of Rheumatology
developed case definitions for 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes in SLE (NPSLE) to
standardize definitions, diagnostic criteria, exclusions, associations and
diagnostic testing3.
Central
nervous system (CNS) symptoms occur much more frequently than peripheral
nervous system symptoms in NPSLE. Moreover, diffuse CNS manifestations, such as
cognitive dysfunction, psychosis, acute confusional state, anxiety and mood
disorders occur more commonly than focal CNS symptoms in most studies. The
focal CNS symptoms including; stroke, demyelinating syndromes, chorea and
transverse myelitis are most frequently secondary to vascular events caused by
antiphospholipid antibodies4-7.
Neuroimaging can be a
useful part of the initial assessment when NP manifestations are suspected
following clinical evaluation in patients with SLE7. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) is currently considered the standard technique for
evaluating morphological brain abnormalities in NPSLE. Most research studies
have identified diffuse cerebral atrophy, small cortical infarcts and
non-specific foci of increased signal in gray and white matter on T2-weighted
images, but the clinical significance of these findings is often unclear8-11.
However, substantial populations of patients with SLE do not have abnormal
brain MRI and have only NP symptoms10-11.
Magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS), a non invasive technique that measures biochemical
metabolites in the brain, is a promising imaging modality7. In SLE,
MRS has been performed in an attempt to detect early CNS involvement or to
demonstrate abnormalities in some patients with NPSLE in whom structural MRI
failed to showed any focal changes12-15. Many authors, found a
decrease in N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) /creatine (Cr) ratio and an increase in
choline (Cho) /Cr ratio in white matter of NPSLE patients10,12-15.
The aim of this study
was to assess the role of 1H-MRS in detection of spectral changes in NPSLE
patients especially when MR imaging failed to show any abnormalities, and, to
correlate their clinical data with MRI and 1H-MRS abnormalities.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This study was carried
out on patients who fulfilled the 1997
updated American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE16.
They were recruited from inpatient and outpatient clinics of Neurology and
Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Departments of Zagazig University
Hospitals.
Inclusion criteria: All
patients had NP manifestations which were defined according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
nomenclature for NPSLE3.
Exclusion criteria: We
excluded patients with (1) SLE without NP manifestations, (2) who were unable
to undergo MRI technique such as patients with claustrophobia, pacemaker and
prosthetic valves, and (3) NP manifestations secondary to infection, drug side
effects and malignancy.
Disease duration was
defined as the time between initial manifestations clearly attributed to SLE
and the day of magnetic resonance spectroscopy acquisition.
Twenty-three patients
with NPSLE and 8 healthy volunteers with similar age and gender distribution
(control group) were included in this study. The study was approved by the
Ethical Committee of our Faculty and informed written consent was obtained from
patients and controls.
All patients and controls were subjected
to:
1- Full history taking.
2- Thorough general and neurological
examinations
3- Assessment of disease activity, using SLE
Disease Activity Index (SLE DAI)17.
4- Neuropsychological assessment:
- Assessment of depression was based on
clinical interview and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)18.
- Cognitive
function was assessed by using a comprehensive test battery included: (1) Digit
span: forward and backward, to assess verbal memory / attention domains19;
(2) Digit symbol: to test sustained attention and concentration19;
(3) Similarities: to test abstract reasoning; (4) Controlled Oral Word
Association Test (COWA): to test language domain20; (5) Trial making
test(B): to detect executive function21; (6) Benton visual retention
test: it measure immediate visual recall memory and visuospatial ability22.
The individual test results were compared with the available data of the
controls. Patients with a score of two or more standard deviation below the normative
value in any of the six domains (attention, memory, language, visuospatial
ability, reasoning and executive function) were considered impaired.
5- Neuroradiologial studies: Brain MRI and
1H-MRS were done for patients and controls.
MRI and MRS Techniques:
MR imaging and
single-voxel 1H brain spectroscopic examinations
were performed with a 1.5-T whole-body MR imaging
and spectroscopic system (MR Achieva Philips Medical Systems) equipped with
actively shielded gradients and a quadrature head
coil. The MRI examination included axial and sagittal Tı-weighted images, axial T2 –
weighted images and axial FLAIR (Fluid attention inversion recovery). The MRI
was evaluated for cortical atrophy, ventricular enlargement, T2/FLAIR
high signal intensity lesions in periventricular white matter and large
infarcts.
Three dimensional proton
spectroscopic imaging was performed with a repetition time (TR) of 1500 ms and
an echotime (TE) of 135 ms using single voxel MRS. Water suppression was
achieved using three Gaussin shaped chemical shift selective pulses (CHESS)
technique.
The voxel was placed
over the parieto-occipital periventricular white matter in all examined
patients and healthy volunteers. In patients with abnormal MRI lesions, a
second voxel was placed over the lesions (white matter hyperintensities, focal
hyperintensities or large infarctions). The size of the voxel was approximately
8 cm3 (2 x 2 x 2 cm).
The number of peaks
fitted included the chemical shift ranges restricted to 3.1–3.3 ppm. for choline
(Cho), 2.9–3.1 ppm. for creatine (Cr) and 1.9–2.1 ppm. for N-acetyl aspartate
(NAA). The lipid-macromolecule-lactate peaks at 1.25–1.35 ppm were integrated.
The relative ratios of NAA/Cr and of Cho/Cr were evaluated in the
parieto-occipital white matter in all patients and volunteers and in areas of
MRI abnormal lesions.
Statistical Analysis
The
collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 11, comparison
between group means was done using student's t-test and (ANOVA) F- test, while
chi-squared test and Kappa agreement were used for qualitative data. The
significance level was considered at P value <0.05.
RESULTS
This study included 23
patients with NPSLE, 21 females and 2 males, their age ranged from 18 to 36
years (mean±SD= 26.4±5.3 years). The mean duration of the disease was 32.5±5.3
months, While, the mean SLE DAI was 17.3±6.1. The NPSLE diagnosis that was
present at study entry is shown in table
(1). The most common NP manifestations were headache in 9 patients (39.1%),
cognitive deficits in 9 patients (39.1%), while, cerebrovascular events occur
only in 2 patients (8.7%), as shown in Table (1) .
Nine of the 23 patients
(39.1%) had abnormal findings on MRI. These findings were cerebral atrophy,
scattered single or multiple foci or patchy areas of increased signal intensity
on T2-weighted or FLAIR images in the periventricular white matter
and infarction. NPSLE patients were divided into two groups according to the
presence or absence of MRI abnormalities. Group I included 14 patients with
normal MRI, while group II included the remaining 9 patients with abnormal MRI.
Table 2, showed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups
regarding clinical data.
The mean NAA/ Cr and
Cho/Cr ratios and their ranges for the 23 NPSLE patients and for the eight
controls were measured. We found a significant decrease in NAA/Cr ratio and a significant increase in Cho/Cr
ratio in the parieto-occipital WM in 20 patients (86.9%) compared with those in
the controls. Eleven of these patients in group I and 9 patients were in group II.
Using Kappa agreement,
we found that spectral changes in 1H-MRS was in agreement and statistically
significant (0.46±0.17, P=0.001**) with NP manifestations, compared with MRI
changes (0.08±0.07, P=0.8 NS). Table (3).
When comparing
neurometabolities ratio of MRS with both groups and the reference control, we
found that, in patients with abnormal MRI, NAA/Cr ratio was significantly lower
than those with normal MRI and control groups (1.35±0.16* Vs 1.6±0.1 and
1.75±0.13 respectively), and Cho/Cr ratio was significantly higher than those
with normal MRI and control groups (0.9±0.05* versus 0.85±0.06 and 0.77±0.065
respectively). The mean NAA/Cr ratios in parieto-occipital white matter were reduced
in patients groups while mean Cho/Cr ratios were higher than in the control.(
Table 4).
DISCUSSION
System ic
lupus erythematosus is a multisystem autoimmune disease, in which NP
manifestations are a common cause of significant morbidity1. The ACR has identified 19 distinct NP
syndromes associated with SLE3. NPSLE manifestations may be caused
by hypercoagulability and endothelial damage in cerebral vessels
(vasculopathy), proinflammatory cytokines, autoantibody effects on neuronal
structures or receptors, BBB disruption and metabolic derangements2,5,6.
In the present study, the most frequent NP syndromes among our 23
patients were headache (39.1%), cognitive dysfunction (39.1%), depression (26%)
and seizures (21.7%). A literature search from April 1999 to May 2008 was
performed by Unterman et al.4, to identify studies investigating NP
syndromes in patients with definite SLE. They reported that, when all 17
studies were pooled together, the most frequent NP syndromes among 5051
patients were headache, mood disorders, seizures, cognitive dysfunction and
cerebrovascular diseases.
Cognitive impairment is
one of the most common and clinically challenging manifestations of SLE, but
its pathophysiology remains poorly understood2,7,23. Cognitive
dysfunction was defined by the ACR as significant deficits in any or all of the
following cognitive functions: attention, reasoning, executive skills, memory,
visuospatial processing, language and psychomotor speed3,7,23. Using
neuropsychological tests, cognitive dysfunction was detected in 9 patients
(39.1%) out of 23 NPSLE patients. This figure is in agreement with those
reported by Abdel-Naser et al.24 and Brey et al.25 where cognitive impairment was detected in
37.5% and 41.4% respectively. However, the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction
is higher than our results4,23.
Conventional MRI
sequencing of the brain is a technique that is widely used for evaluating NPSLE
and has proven to be more sensitive than CT8. The most common
findings seen with MRI include areas of increased signal in various locations
of the white matter on T2-weighted imaging, infarction, and brain
atrophy8-11. In the present study such morphological brain
abnormalities were present in 9 of the 23 SLE patients (39.1%) entering the
study with NP manifestations. This is markedly lower than the 60-70-86% seen
in previous studies9,13,14,
but it is in agreement with Oku et al.26, who found MRI
abnormalities in 35% of NPSLE.
Although MRI appears
sensitive for detecting abnormalities in patients with focal neurological
defects, its sensitivity is very low in patients with diffuse neuropsychiatric
disturbances such as headache, cognitive dysfunction and depression.
Furthermore, many patients with NPSLE have no abnormal findings on MRI9-11,13,27,28.
These findings may explains the lower percentage of MRI abnormalities as
the most frequent NP manifestations in our study were headache, cognitive
dysfunction and depression. In addition, we found 14 (60.9%) NPSLE patients
with normal MRI.
MRS is the only non
invasive technique that routinely used in clinical practice and research that
allows assessment of in vivo metabolism at the molecular level6,12,14,28.
This technique shows four major spectra corresponding to different
metabolites. NAA which can be considered a marker of neuronal integrity, Cho
that are released during active myelin breakdown; Cr which has a constant
concentration throughout the brain and tends to be resistant to change and
lactate12,15,29.
Several
previous studies of MRS in patients with NPSLE have demonstrated a decrease in
NAA/Cr ratio in the basal ganglia, frontal white matter, peritrigonal white
matter and parieto-occipital WM10,12-15,28-30. The
reduction in NAA is believed to be a result of neuronal injury caused by
microinfarcts from extensive small vessels damage. Raised Cho has been ascribed
to inflammatory process rather than to demyelinating or cell membrane
degradation10,15,31,32.
In
accordance with these studies, our results demonstrated a significant decrease
in NAA/Cr ratio and a significant increase in Cho/Cr ratio in the
parieto-occipital WM in 20 patients (86.9%) compared with those in the
controls. These patients include 11 in group I (normal MRI) and all patients in
group II with abnormal MRI. These results support the idea that MRS abnormalities
could precede the appearance of hyperintense lesions in T2 or FLAIR
sequences due to CNS involvement of SLE. These metabolic abnormalities
suggested that they could represent an early sign of neuronal injury in NPSLE
patients, even in the presence of normal brain MRI. Thus is useful in making a
diagnosis at the subclinical stage of the disease13-15,28-30.
A follow up study of the
patients who had a further MRI some years later was performed by Castellino et
al.29, three of them showed new MRI lesions in areas previously
positive to MRS and negative on MRI examination. These data, if confirmed, may
be predictive of future parenchymal damage, as suggested by Axford et al.15.
However in the Appenzellar et al.30 study, after 19 months of follow
up, they did not observe that the low NAA/Cr ratio predispose to the appearance
of structural lesions detected by MRI. Perhaps longer periods of observation
are necessary to detect the appearance of these lesions as suggested by
Castellino et al.29.
In our study, we found
significant differences in the metabolic ratios between patients with abnormal
MRI and those with normal MRI and controls. Similarly. These significant
differences were detected in previous studies10,13,28,31,32. In
contrast, the study of Sundgen et al.14 was not able to demonstrate
any differences in spectroscopic parameters between patients with and without
MRI abnormalities. Appenzellar et al.30 reported that NAA/Cr ratio
were lower in SLE patients with MRI abnormalities but no difference in Cho/Cr
values.
In
the current study, we found non significant relation between cognitive
dysfunction and MRI abnormalities. In one small study of patients with
NPSLE individuals with cognitive
impairment had more cerebral atrophy and large T2-weighted lesions
than NPSLE patients with normal cognitive abilities11. Other
studies, however, have not found significant associations between specific MRI
findings and cognitive function in SLE7,8,9,33. On the contrary, we
detected significant relation between cognitive dysfunction and MRS
abnormalities. Preliminary studies of MRS in patients with NPSLE suggested that
decreased level of NAA and increased Cho/Cr ratio in gray and WM correlate with
cognitive abnormalities in adult SLE31,33,34. Lapteva et al.34
reported that MRS in patients with SLE with moderate or severe cognitive
dysfunction had significantly higher Cho/Cr ratio compared with patients with
mild cognitive dysfunction or normal cognition.
Conclusion
In our NPSLE patients, MRS findings seem to reflect the cerebral
metabolic disturbances even in absence of morphological lesions detectable by
MRI. MRS may be a useful technique in the early detection and evaluation of CNS
abnormalities in NPSLE. The combination of MRI and MRS may be useful to improve
the diagnostic value and gain a better understanding of the pathophysiological
mechanisms responsible for brain damage in SLE.
[Disclosure: Authors report no
conflict of interest]
REFERENCES
1.
Smith PP, Gordon C.
Systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical presentations. Autoimmune Rev. 2010; 10:43–5.
2.
Sanna G, Bertolaccini
ML, Khamashta MA. Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus:
current therapeutic approach. Curr Pharm Dis. 2008; 14: 1261–9.
3.
ACR Ad Hoc Committee on
Neuropsychiatric Lupus. The American
College of Rheumatology
nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42: 599–608.
4.
Unterman
A, Nolte JES, Boaz M, Abady M, Shenfield Y, Zandman-Goddard G. Neuropsychiatric
syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta analysis. Semin Arthritis
Rheum. 2010; 39: 1–11.
5.
Sanchez-Guerrero J,
Aranow C, Mackay M, Volpe B, Diamond B. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus
erythematosus reconsidered. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008; 4: 11–3.
6.
Arnow C, Diamond B,
Mackary M. Glutamate receptor biology and its clinical significance in
neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2010;
36: 187–201.
7.
Levy DM, Ardoin SP,
Schanberg LE. Neurocognitive impairment in children and adolescents with
systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2009; 5: 106–114.
8.
Sibbitt WL Jr, Sibbitt
RR, Brooks WM. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 2026–38.
9.
Jennings JE, Sundgen PC,
Attwood J, McCune J, Maly P. Value of MRI of the brain in patients with
systemic lupus erythematosus and neurologic disturbance. Neuroradiology. 2004;
46: 15–21.
10. Lim MK, Suh CH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Choi
SH, Kang JH, et al. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Brain MR Imaging and
Single-Voxel Hydrogen 1 MR Spectroscopy. Radiology. 2000; 217: 43–9.
11.
Ainiala H, Dastidar P,
Loukkola J, Peltola J. Cerebral MRI abnormalities and their association with
NPSLE: a population based study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2005; 34: 376–82.
12.
Sibbitt WL Jr, Haseler
LJ, Griffey RR, Friedman SD, Brooks WM. Neurometabolism of active
neuropsychiatric lupus determined with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR. 1997; 18: 1271-7.
13. Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, Paley MN, Shortall
E, Carter S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and cerebral proton
spectroscopy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis
Rheum. 1997; 40: 36-46.
14.
Sundgen PC, Jennings J,
Attwood JT, Nan B, Gebarski S, McCune WJ, Pang Y, Maly P. MRI and 20 CSI- MR
spectroscopy of the brain in the evaluation of patients with acute onset of
neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Neuroradiology. 2005; 47: 576-85.
15.
Axford JS, Howe FA,
Heron C, Griffiths JR. Sensitivity of quantitative 1H- magnetic resonance
spectroscopy of the brain in detecting early neuronal damage in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001; 60: 106–11.
16. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College
of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus
erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40: 1725-6.
17. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH,
The Committee on Prognostic Studies in SLE. Derivation of the SLE DAI: a
disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1992; 35: 630-40.
18.
Beck AT, Rial WY, Rickels K.
Short form of depression inventory: cross validation. Psychol Rep. 1974; 34: 1184-6.
19. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale- Revised. New York,
Psychological Corporation. 1981.
20. Benton A,
Hamsher K, Sivan AB. Multilingual aphasia examination. 3rd ed. Iowa City, IA:
AJ Association; 1994.
21. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead Retian
Neuropsychological Test Battery: theory and
clinical interpretation. Tueson: Neuropsychology press. 1993.
22.
Benton AL. The
revised visual retention test. 4Th. Ed. New
York: Psychological Corporation; 1974.
23.
Alfetra A, Garzia P,
Mitterhfer AP, Vadacca M, Galluzo S, Porto FD, et al. Neuropsychiatric lupus
syndromes. Relation with antiphospholipid antibodies. Neurology. 2003; 61: 108–10.
24.
Abdel–Nasser
AM, Ghaleb RM, Mahmoud JA, Khairy W, Mahmoud RM. Association of anti-ribosomal
P protein antibodies with neuropsychiatric and other manifestations of systemic
lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2008; 27: 1377-85.
25.
Brey RL, Holliday SL,
Saklad AR, Navarrete MG, Hermoillo-Romo D, Stallwoth CL, et al.
Neuropsychiatric syndromes in lupus, Prevalence using standardized definitions.
Neurology. 2002; 58: 1214-20.
26.
Oku K, Atsumi T,
Furukawa S, Horita T, Sakai Y, Jodo S, et al. Cerebral imaging by magnetic
resonance imaging and single photon emission computed tomography in systemic
lupus erythematosus with central nervous system involvement. Rheumatol. 2003;
42; 773-7.
27.
Appenzeller
S, Pike GB, Clarke AE. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of central
nervous system manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy
Immunol. 2008; 34: 361-6.
28.
Spinosa
MJ, Bandeira M, Liberalesso PB, Vieitra SC, Janz LLJr, Sa EG. Clinical,
laboratory and neuroimaging findings in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus
presenting involvement of the nervous system. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007; 65: 433-9.
29. Castellino G, Govoni M, Padovan M, Colamussi P, Borrelli M,
Trotta F. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy may predict future brain
lesions in SLE patients: a functional multi-imaging approach and follow up. Ann
Rheum Dis. 2005; 64: 1022–7.
30.
Appenzellar S, Li LM,
Costallat LTL, Cendes F. Evidence of reversible axonal dysfunction in systemic
lupus erythematosus: a proton MRS study. Brain. 2005; 128: 1-8.
31.
Brooks
WM, Jung RE, Ford CC, Gremel EJ, Sibbitt WL Jr. Relationship between
neurometabolite derangement and neurocognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus
erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 1999; 26: 81-5.
32.
Friedman SD, Stidelaley
CA, Books WM, Hart BL, Sibbitt WL Jr. Brain injury and neurometabolic abnormalities
in systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiology. 1998; 209: 74-84.
33.
Kozora E, West SG,
Kotzin BL, Julian L, Porter S, Bigler E. Cognition, MRS neurometabolities and
MRI volumetrics in non-neuropsychiatric
systemic lupus erythematosus. Preliminary data. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2005; 18: 159-62.
34.
Lapteva
L, Nowak M, Yarboro CH, Takada K, Roebuck-Spencer T, Weickert T, et al.
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies, cognitive dysfunction, and
depression in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 54: 2505-14.